Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Schilt BedrijvenSchilt Bedrijven
VS
Bechtel CorporationBechtel Corporation
Schilt Bedrijven

Schilt Bedrijven

N/A

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

Gezamenlijk kunnen onze 3 business units (Airconditioning - Luchtkanalen - Luchttechniek) het complete binnenklimaatpakket verzorgen van a tot z. Hierbij wordt hoog ingezet op duurzaamheid, energiezuinigheid en een geluidsarme werking. We beschikken over het CO2-Bewus...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:72
Subsidiaries:58
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bechtel Corporation

Bechtel Corporation

Reston, 20190, US

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.bechtel.com
739/1000Moderate

Bechtel is a trusted engineering, construction and project management partner to industry and government. Differentiated by the quality of our people and our relentless drive to deliver the most successful outcomes, we align our capabilities to our customers’ objectives...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:33,902
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Schilt Bedrijven

Schilt Bedrijven

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bechtel Corporation

Bechtel Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schilt Bedrijven in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

Bechtel Corporation has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Schilt Bedrijven (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schilt Bedrijven cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bechtel Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bechtel Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Schilt Bedrijven

Schilt Bedrijven

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bechtel Corporation

Bechtel Corporation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BROBECTHEORAABB1773750615
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
BRO3105131112625

FAQ

Between Schilt Bedrijven company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Schilt Bedrijven company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Schilt Bedrijven company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Schilt Bedrijven company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Schilt Bedrijven company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Schilt Bedrijven company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Schilt Bedrijven company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Schilt Bedrijven company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Schilt Bedrijven company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Schilt Bedrijven company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Schilt Bedrijven company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Schilt Bedrijven and Bechtel Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Schilt Bedrijven and Bechtel Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Schilt Bedrijven or Bechtel Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Schilt Bedrijven or Bechtel Corporation ?
Between Schilt Bedrijven and Bechtel Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Schilt Bedrijven and Bechtel Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3