Comparison Overview

Schibsted

VS

foodpanda

Schibsted

Akersgata 55, Oslo, 0105, 0105, NO
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Schibsted has entered a new era. From June 7th, our two main business areas became two separate companies – one media company and one marketplace company. ✨ Schibsted Media continues our proud tradition of delivering trustworthy journalism through renowned brands such as VG, Aftonbladet, Aftenposten and Svenska Dagbladet. ✨ Schibsted Marketplaces focuses on connecting millions of users each month through leading platforms like Finn, Blocket, Tori and Oikotie. For now, both companies will share this LinkedIn/Facebook account to keep our followers informed about our latest news and opportunities. Learn more about our exciting journey here: https://schibsted.com/the-schibsted-separation/ Explore career opportunities and learn more about both companies here: http://www.schibsted.com/Career/ http://www.schibstedmedia.com/Career/

NAICS: 425
NAICS Definition: Wholesale Electronic Markets and Agents and Brokers
Employees: 6,295
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

foodpanda

63 Robinson Road, Singapore, Singapore, 068894, SG
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

At foodpanda, we're on a mission to redefine how food, people, culture and tech are connected. Our panda family consists of problem solvers, designers and thinkers, working around the clock to make foodpanda the most powerful online tool for food convenience in the universe- and we’re just getting started! foodpanda operates in 11 locations worldwide. Through the energy of our teams in all of our offices, we connect lovers of food to our brilliant partners through our amazing riders. We're changing the way food convenience is viewed and experienced worldwide. If you're passionate about good food and great work, you're in the right place.

NAICS: 425
NAICS Definition: Wholesale Electronic Markets and Agents and Brokers
Employees: 15,283
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schibsted-asa.jpeg
Schibsted
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foodpanda.jpeg
foodpanda
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Schibsted
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
foodpanda
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Internet Marketplace Platforms Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schibsted in 2025.

Incidents vs Internet Marketplace Platforms Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for foodpanda in 2025.

Incident History — Schibsted (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schibsted cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — foodpanda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

foodpanda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schibsted-asa.jpeg
Schibsted
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foodpanda.jpeg
foodpanda
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

foodpanda company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Schibsted company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, foodpanda company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Schibsted company.

In the current year, foodpanda company and Schibsted company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither foodpanda company nor Schibsted company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither foodpanda company nor Schibsted company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither foodpanda company nor Schibsted company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Schibsted company nor foodpanda company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Schibsted nor foodpanda holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Schibsted company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to foodpanda company.

foodpanda company employs more people globally than Schibsted company, reflecting its scale as a Internet Marketplace Platforms.

Neither Schibsted nor foodpanda holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Schibsted nor foodpanda holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Schibsted nor foodpanda holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Schibsted nor foodpanda holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Schibsted nor foodpanda holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Schibsted nor foodpanda holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H