Schakel-&-schrale vs Fluor - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

Comparison Overview

Schakel & Schrale

VS

Fluor Corporation

Schakel & Schrale

Elsrijkdreef 207, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1103 MJ, NL

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

http://www.schakel-schrale.nl

752/1000Fair

Schakel & Schrale is een Erkend Restauratie Bouwbedrijf met meer dan honderd jaar ervaring en is gespecialiseerd in restauratie- en renovatiewerkzaamheden. Wij voeren zowel kleinere als grote werken uit vaak in een binnenstedelijke omgeving en voldoen aan alle eisen die...

NAICS:23

NAICS Definition:Construction

Employees:0

Subsidiaries:1

12-month incidents

0

Known data breaches

0

Attack type number

0

Fluor Corporation

6700 Las Colinas Blvd., Irving, 75039, US

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

http://www.fluor.com

775/1000Fair

Fluor Corporation is a global engineering, procurement and construction company. We work with leaders in the energy, infrastructure, life sciences, advanced technologies, mining and metals industries, as well as government agencies, to build a better world. Since our f...

NAICS:23

NAICS Definition:Construction

Employees:36,351

Subsidiaries:1

12-month incidents

0

Known data breaches

0

Attack type number

0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

Schakel & Schrale

-

ISO 27001Not verified

-

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

-

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

-

GDPRNot verified

-

PCI DSSNot verified

-

HIPAANot verified

Fluor Corporation

-

ISO 27001Not verified

-

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

-

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

-

GDPRNot verified

-

PCI DSSNot verified

-

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schakel & Schrale in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fluor Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Schakel & Schrale (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schakel & Schrale cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fluor Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fluor Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

Schakel & Schrale

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

Fluor Corporation

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Schakel & Schrale company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Schakel & Schrale company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Schakel & Schrale company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Schakel & Schrale company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Schakel & Schrale company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Schakel & Schrale company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Schakel & Schrale company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Schakel & Schrale company and Fluor Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Schakel & Schrale company and Fluor Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Schakel & Schrale company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Schakel & Schrale company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Schakel & Schrale and Fluor Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Schakel & Schrale and Fluor Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Schakel & Schrale or Fluor Corporation ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Schakel & Schrale or Fluor Corporation ?

Between Schakel & Schrale and Fluor Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Schakel & Schrale and Fluor Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-103047

SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - CentralAuth extension allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Mediawiki - CentralAuth extension: before 1.46.1, 1.45.5, 1.43.10.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-29

UPDATED

Date2026-09-29

IMPACT SCORE

NA

EXPLOITABILITY

NA

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-103046

SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki - WikiLambda extension allows Stored XSS. This issue affects MediaWiki - WikiLambda extension: before 1.46.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-29

UPDATED

Date2026-09-29

IMPACT SCORE

NA

EXPLOITABILITY

NA

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-103045

SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - Refreshed skin allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Mediawiki - Refreshed skin: before 1.46.1, 1.45.5, 1.43.10.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-29

UPDATED

Date2026-09-29

IMPACT SCORE

NA

EXPLOITABILITY

NA

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-103044

SUMMARY

XML injection (aka blind XPath injection) vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - EasyTimeline extension allows XML Injection. This issue affects Mediawiki - EasyTimeline extension: before 1.46.1, 1.45.5, 1.43.10.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-29

UPDATED

Date2026-09-29

IMPACT SCORE

NA

EXPLOITABILITY

NA

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-103043

SUMMARY

anchorme through 3.0.8 contains a regular expression denial of service vulnerability in the IPv6 host extraction regex due to catastrophic backtracking. Attackers can supply specially crafted input strings with repeated patterns to cause exponential regex engine backtracking, blocking the Node.js event loop and denying service to other requests.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-29

UPDATED

Date2026-09-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVSS4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES