Comparison Overview
SCC DIGITAL
SCC DIGITAL
Warwick Road, Birmingham, B11 2LE , GB
Last Update: 28/03/2026
SCC Digital is the managed services arm of SCC focused on providing a holistic approach to solving business challenges using IT solutions. With advanced capabilities across Cybersecurity, Cloud, Data, AI, App Innovation and Productivity, our team of experts build sca...
Nothing
John Street, London, GB
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Nothing exists to make tech feel exciting again. We’re building a different kind of company, one that puts design, emotion, and human creativity at the heart of everything we do. From the way our products look to how they sound, feel, and function, we care about the de...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
SCC DIGITAL
Nothing
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SCC DIGITAL in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
Nothing has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - SCC DIGITAL (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SCC DIGITAL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Nothing (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Nothing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
SCC DIGITAL
Nothing
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.