Comparison Overview
Scania Group

Scania Group
Vagnmakarvägen 1, Södertälje, SE, SE-151 87
Last Update: 08/04/2026
Scania is a world-leading provider of transport solutions committed to a better tomorrow. Our purpose is to drive the shift towards a sustainable transport system. In doing so, we are creating a world of mobility that’s better for business, society and our environment. ...

Mercedes-Benz USA
303 Perimeter Center North, Atlanta, 30346, US
Last Update: 17/06/2026
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA), a Daimler Company, is responsible for the Distribution and Marketing of Mercedes-Benz and smart products in the United States. MBUSA was founded in 1965 and prior to that Mercedes-Benz cars were sold in the United States by Mercedes-Benz...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Scania Group







Mercedes-Benz USA






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Scania Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Mercedes-Benz USA has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Scania Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Scania Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Mercedes-Benz USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mercedes-Benz USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Scania Group

Mercedes-Benz USA
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.