Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Scania Latin AmericaScania Latin America
VS
Motherson GroupMotherson Group
Scania Latin America

Scania Latin America

Avenida José Odorizzi 151, São Bernardo do Campo, 09810-000, BR

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile

Scania is a leading supplier of solutions and services for sustainable transport, as well as engines for industrial and marine applications and power generation. Service-related products account for a growing proportion of the company’s operations, assuring Scania custo...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:3,513
Subsidiaries:66
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Motherson Group

Motherson Group

Plot number 1, Noida, 201301, IN

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.motherson.com
777/1000Fair

Motherson is a diversified global design, engineering, manufacturing and assembly (DEMA) specialist, delivering full-system solutions to customers across a wide range of industries. With a robust network of 425 state-of-the-art facilities across 44 countries, and a dedi...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:23,207
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Scania Latin America

Scania Latin America

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Motherson Group

Motherson Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scania Latin America in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Motherson Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Scania Latin America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scania Latin America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Motherson Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Motherson Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Scania Latin America

Scania Latin America

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Motherson Group

Motherson Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Scania Latin America company and Motherson Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Scania Latin America company and Motherson Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Scania Latin America company and Motherson Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Scania Latin America company and Motherson Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Scania Latin America company and Motherson Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Scania Latin America company and Motherson Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Scania Latin America company and Motherson Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Scania Latin America company and Motherson Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Scania Latin America company and Motherson Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Scania Latin America company and Motherson Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Scania Latin America company and Motherson Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Scania Latin America and Motherson Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Scania Latin America and Motherson Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Scania Latin America or Motherson Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Scania Latin America or Motherson Group ?
Between Scania Latin America and Motherson Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Scania Latin America and Motherson Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2