Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Scania Industrial Operations AsiaScania Industrial Operations Asia
VS
Freudenberg GroupFreudenberg Group
Scania Industrial Operations Asia

Scania Industrial Operations Asia

Building A3, 999 Haiyang North Road, Rugao, Jiangsu, CN, 226500

Last Update: 29/10/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.scania.com
747/1000Moderate

Scania is a world-leading provider of transport solutions and is part of TRATON Group. Together with our partners and customers we are driving the shift towards a sustainable transport system. After having had industrial hubs in Europe and Latin America for many years,...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:205
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Freudenberg Group

Freudenberg Group

Höhnerweg 2-4, Weinheim, DE, 69469

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.freudenberg.com/
770/1000Fair

Freudenberg is a global technology group that strengthens its customers and society long-term through forward-looking innovations. Together with its partners, customers and research institutions, the Freudenberg Group develops leading-edge technologies and excellent pro...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:19,820
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Scania Industrial Operations Asia

Scania Industrial Operations Asia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Freudenberg Group

Freudenberg Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scania Industrial Operations Asia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Freudenberg Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Scania Industrial Operations Asia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scania Industrial Operations Asia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Freudenberg Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Freudenberg Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Scania Industrial Operations Asia

Scania Industrial Operations Asia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Freudenberg Group

Freudenberg Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Scania Industrial Operations Asia company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Scania Industrial Operations Asia company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Scania Industrial Operations Asia company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Scania Industrial Operations Asia company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Scania Industrial Operations Asia company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Scania Industrial Operations Asia company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Scania Industrial Operations Asia company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Scania Industrial Operations Asia company and Freudenberg Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Scania Industrial Operations Asia company and Freudenberg Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Scania Industrial Operations Asia company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Scania Industrial Operations Asia company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Scania Industrial Operations Asia and Freudenberg Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Scania Industrial Operations Asia and Freudenberg Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Scania Industrial Operations Asia or Freudenberg Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Scania Industrial Operations Asia or Freudenberg Group ?
Between Scania Industrial Operations Asia and Freudenberg Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Scania Industrial Operations Asia and Freudenberg Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2