Comparison Overview
Scalable Capital
Scalable Capital
Seitzstraße 8e, München, 80538, DE
Last Update: 31/03/2026
Scalable Capital is a leading digital banking and investment platform with a full banking licence, enabling people in Europe to take control of their finances. The company was founded in 2014 and has offices in Munich, Berlin, Vienna, Milan and London. For private ind...
Equifax
P.O. Box 740241, Atlanta, 30374, US
Last Update: 13/09/2026
At Equifax (NYSE: EFX), we believe knowledge drives progress. As a global data, analytics, and technology company, we play an essential role in the global economy by helping financial institutions, companies, employers, and government agencies make critical decisions wi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Scalable Capital
Equifax
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Scalable Capital in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Equifax has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Scalable Capital (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Scalable Capital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Equifax (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Equifax cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Scalable Capital
Equifax
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.