Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors)Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors)
VS
Baker Tilly USBaker Tilly US
Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors)

Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors)

877 Executive Center Drive West, Suite 100, St. Petersburg, FL, US, 33702

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://sorren.com/firm/sbf/
704/1000Moderate

Sorren is a new Top 50 firm built on collaboration, bold thinking, and a commitment to putting people first. The financial landscape is evolving rapidly, and clients require more than just answers. They need advisors who anticipate opportunities and prepare them for wh...

NAICS:5412
NAICS Definition:Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees:97
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Baker Tilly US

Baker Tilly US

205 N. Michigan Ave., Chicago, 60601, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bakertilly.com
772/1000Fair

Baker Tilly is a leading advisory, tax and assurance firm, providing clients with a genuine coast-to-coast and global advantage in major regions of the U.S. and in many of the world’s leading financial centers – New York, London, San Francisco, Seattle, Los Angeles, Chi...

NAICS:5412
NAICS Definition:Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees:10,396
Subsidiaries:39
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors)

Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Baker Tilly US

Baker Tilly US

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baker Tilly US in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Baker Tilly US (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baker Tilly US cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors)

Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SBF915072925
Baker Tilly US

Baker Tilly US

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) company and Baker Tilly US company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) company and Baker Tilly US company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) and Baker Tilly US, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) and Baker Tilly US, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) or Baker Tilly US ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) or Baker Tilly US ?
Between Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) and Baker Tilly US, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sorren (Formerly SBF Advisors) and Baker Tilly US, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8