Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sazerac CompanySazerac Company
VS
Southern Glazer's Wine & SpiritsSouthern Glazer's Wine & Spirits
Sazerac Company

Sazerac Company

Suite 300, Louisville, Kentucky, 40223, US

Last Update: 16/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.sazerac.com/
785/1000Fair

Founded in 1850, Sazerac Company has thrived as an independent, American family-owned company with operations in the United States and around the world. Since the 2000s, Sazerac has averaged double digit growth every year! Our vision is to become one of the industry’s ...

NAICS:3121
NAICS Definition:Beverage Manufacturing
Employees:2,226
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Miami, None, Miami, Florida, US, 33169

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
801/1000Good

Southern Glazer’s Wine & Spirits is the world’s pre-eminent distributor of beverage alcohol, and proud to be a multi-generational, family-owned company. We have operations in 47 states and Canada. We offer an array of careers focused on delivering a captivating and rewa...

NAICS:3121
NAICS Definition:Beverage Manufacturing
Employees:16,829
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sazerac Company

Sazerac Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sazerac Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sazerac Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sazerac Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sazerac Company

Sazerac Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sazerac Company company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sazerac Company company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sazerac Company company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sazerac Company company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sazerac Company company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sazerac Company company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sazerac Company company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sazerac Company company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sazerac Company company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sazerac Company company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sazerac Company company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sazerac Company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sazerac Company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sazerac Company or Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sazerac Company or Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits ?
Between Sazerac Company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sazerac Company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA