Comparison Overview

Save the Children International

VS

American Red Cross

Save the Children International

1 St. Johns Lane , London, England, GB, EC1M 4BL 
Last Update: 2026-01-18

Save the Children Save the Children is the world's leading independent organisation for children. We work in around 120 countries. Our vision is to live in a world in which every child attains the right to survival, protection, development and participation. Last year Save the Children's programmes and campaigns reached more than 55 million children directly around the world, through our and our partners'​ work. We work to inspire breakthroughs in the way the world treats children and to achieve immediate and lasting change in their lives. Across all of our work, we pursue several core values: accountability, ambition, collaboration, creativity and integrity.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17,354
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

American Red Cross

430 17th St NW, Washington, 20006, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

The American Red Cross prevents and alleviates human suffering in the face of emergencies by mobilizing the power of volunteers and the generosity of donors. Each day, thousands of people – people just like you – provide compassionate care to those in need. Our network of generous donors, volunteers and employees share a mission of preventing and relieving suffering, here at home and around the world. We roll up our sleeves and donate time, money and blood. We learn or teach life-saving skills so our communities can be better prepared when the need arises. We do this every day because the Red Cross is needed - every day.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 33,242
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/save-the-children-international.jpeg
Save the Children International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-red-cross.jpeg
American Red Cross
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Save the Children International
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
American Red Cross
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Save the Children International in 2026.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Red Cross in 2026.

Incident History — Save the Children International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Save the Children International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — American Red Cross (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Red Cross cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/save-the-children-international.jpeg
Save the Children International
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-red-cross.jpeg
American Red Cross
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2022
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Save the Children International company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to American Red Cross company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Save the Children International and American Red Cross have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, American Red Cross company and Save the Children International company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Both American Red Cross company and Save the Children International company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Neither American Red Cross company nor Save the Children International company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither American Red Cross company nor Save the Children International company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Save the Children International company nor American Red Cross company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Save the Children International nor American Red Cross holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Save the Children International company nor American Red Cross company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

American Red Cross company employs more people globally than Save the Children International company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Neither Save the Children International nor American Red Cross holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Save the Children International nor American Red Cross holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Save the Children International nor American Red Cross holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Save the Children International nor American Red Cross holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Save the Children International nor American Red Cross holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Save the Children International nor American Red Cross holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H