Comparison Overview

Save the Children International

VS

AIESEC

Save the Children International

1 St. Johns Lane , London, England, GB, EC1M 4BL 
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.savethechildren.net

Save the Children Save the Children is the world's leading independent organisation for children. We work in around 120 countries. Our vision is to live in a world in which every child attains the right to survival, protection, development and participation. Last year Save the Children's programmes and campaigns reached more than 55 million children directly around the world, through our and our partners'​ work. We work to inspire breakthroughs in the way the world treats children and to achieve immediate and lasting change in their lives. Across all of our work, we pursue several core values: accountability, ambition, collaboration, creativity and integrity.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17,354
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

AIESEC

5605 Avenue de Gaspé, Montreal, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
https://aiesec.org/partners

AIESEC develops leadership among youth aged 18 to 30 and contributes to strengthening the global employability market by providing an end-to-end international talent recruitment solution for Enterprises, NGOs, and Start-ups. AIESEC is the world's largest youth-run organization developing the leadership potential of young people. Present in 120+ countries and territories across 2600 universities, we provide students and recent graduates with life-changing experiences to intern or volunteer abroad within partner organizations. We partner with organizations ranging from Fortune 500 to local enterprises in developing and sourcing their global talent needs across our network. Through our programs in universities, we provide organizations with access to a global network of young talent who have the capabilities to make a positive impact. For the last seven decades, we have developed over one million leaders ranging from business, civil society, and world leaders, including one Nobel Peace Prize Laureate. Learn more about us at - http://partners.aiesec.org

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13,006
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/save-the-children-international.jpeg
Save the Children International
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aiesec.jpeg
AIESEC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Save the Children International
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AIESEC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Save the Children International in 2026.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AIESEC in 2026.

Incident History — Save the Children International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Save the Children International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AIESEC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AIESEC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/save-the-children-international.jpeg
Save the Children International
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aiesec.jpeg
AIESEC
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unsecured Server
Blog: Blog

FAQ

AIESEC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Save the Children International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Save the Children International and AIESEC have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, AIESEC company and Save the Children International company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Save the Children International company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while AIESEC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

AIESEC company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Save the Children International company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AIESEC company nor Save the Children International company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Save the Children International company nor AIESEC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Save the Children International nor AIESEC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Save the Children International company nor AIESEC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Save the Children International company employs more people globally than AIESEC company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Neither Save the Children International nor AIESEC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Save the Children International nor AIESEC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Save the Children International nor AIESEC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Save the Children International nor AIESEC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Save the Children International nor AIESEC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Save the Children International nor AIESEC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References