Comparison Overview
SATS

SATS
N/A
Last Update: 25/03/2026

Aetna, a CVS Health Company
151 Farmington Avenue, Hartford, 06156, US
Last Update: 03/09/2026
Here at Aetna, a CVS Health® company, we’re building a healthier world by making health care easy, affordable and all about you. Because Healthier Happens Together™! Follow our page for company news, industry commentary, jobs and more. Founded in 1853 in Hartford, CT, A...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

SATS







Aetna, a CVS Health Company






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SATS in 2026.
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Aetna, a CVS Health Company in 2026.
Incident History - SATS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SATS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Aetna, a CVS Health Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aetna, a CVS Health Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

SATS

Aetna, a CVS Health Company
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.