Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Satakunnan OsuuskauppaSatakunnan Osuuskauppa
VS
Grupo Carrefour BrasilGrupo Carrefour Brasil
Satakunnan Osuuskauppa

Satakunnan Osuuskauppa

Itäkeskuksenkaari 1, Pori, Western Finland 28130, FI

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
769/1000Fair

Satakunnan Osuuskauppa on satakuntalaisten ihmisten omistama satakuntalainen yritys. Liiketoiminta-alueemme ovat market- ja tavaratalokauppa, liikennekauppa, autohuolto sekä majoitus- ja ravitsemiskauppa.

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo Carrefour Brasil

Grupo Carrefour Brasil

Avenida Tucunaré 125, Barueri, São Paulo, BR, 06460-020

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
818/1000Good

Reunimos uma equipe com mais de 70.000 colaboradores que representam a diversidade deste país. Hoje, somos um dos maiores empregadores do Brasil. Junto com os nossos fornecedores e parceiros, estamos comprometidos em satisfazer e encantar os consumidores todos os dias, ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:13,586
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Satakunnan Osuuskauppa

Satakunnan Osuuskauppa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Carrefour Brasil

Grupo Carrefour Brasil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Satakunnan Osuuskauppa in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Carrefour Brasil in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Satakunnan Osuuskauppa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Satakunnan Osuuskauppa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Carrefour Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Carrefour Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Satakunnan Osuuskauppa

Satakunnan Osuuskauppa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo Carrefour Brasil

Grupo Carrefour Brasil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Satakunnan Osuuskauppa company and Grupo Carrefour Brasil company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Satakunnan Osuuskauppa company and Grupo Carrefour Brasil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Satakunnan Osuuskauppa company and Grupo Carrefour Brasil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Satakunnan Osuuskauppa company and Grupo Carrefour Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Satakunnan Osuuskauppa company and Grupo Carrefour Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Satakunnan Osuuskauppa company and Grupo Carrefour Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Satakunnan Osuuskauppa company and Grupo Carrefour Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Satakunnan Osuuskauppa company and Grupo Carrefour Brasil company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Satakunnan Osuuskauppa company and Grupo Carrefour Brasil company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Satakunnan Osuuskauppa company and Grupo Carrefour Brasil company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Satakunnan Osuuskauppa company and Grupo Carrefour Brasil company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Satakunnan Osuuskauppa and Grupo Carrefour Brasil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Satakunnan Osuuskauppa and Grupo Carrefour Brasil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Satakunnan Osuuskauppa or Grupo Carrefour Brasil ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Satakunnan Osuuskauppa or Grupo Carrefour Brasil ?
Between Satakunnan Osuuskauppa and Grupo Carrefour Brasil, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Satakunnan Osuuskauppa and Grupo Carrefour Brasil, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2