Comparison Overview
Sartorius Stedim Biotech

Sartorius Stedim Biotech
Avenue de Jouques, AUBAGNE Cedex, undefined, 13781, FR
Last Update: 19/02/2026
A profile of Sartorius Stedim Biotech Leading Partner Sartorius Stedim Biotech is a leading partner of the biopharma industry. Our solutions are supporting our customers to produce drugs safely, timely and economically. The key product categories of our company are cel...

Agilent Technologies
5301 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Santa Clara, 95051, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Agilent customers are finding new ways to treat cancer, ensure food, water, air, and medicine quality and safety, discover new drug treatments, research infectious diseases, and create alternative energy solutions for a greener planet. From start to finish, we have them...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sartorius Stedim Biotech







Agilent Technologies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sartorius Stedim Biotech in 2026.
Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Agilent Technologies in 2026.
Incident History - Sartorius Stedim Biotech (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sartorius Stedim Biotech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Agilent Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Agilent Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sartorius Stedim Biotech

Agilent Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.