Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sargent & LundySargent & Lundy
VS
WorleyWorley
Sargent & Lundy

Sargent & Lundy

Chicago, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.sargentlundy.com
743/1000Moderate

Sargent & Lundy is one of the world’s longest-standing full-service architect engineering firms. Founded in 1891, the firm is a global leader in power, energy, and decarbonization with expertise in grid modernization, renewable energy, energy storage, nuclear power, fos...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:4,303
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Worley

Worley

420 George St, Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.worley.com
769/1000Fair

Worley is a global professional services company of energy, chemicals and resources experts headquartered in Australia. We’re bridging two worlds, accelerating the shift to more sustainable energy sources, while helping our customers provide the energy, chemicals and ...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:37,624
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sargent & Lundy

Sargent & Lundy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Worley

Worley

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sargent & Lundy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Worley in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sargent & Lundy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sargent & Lundy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Worley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Worley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sargent & Lundy

Sargent & Lundy

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SAR644072625
Worley

Worley

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sargent & Lundy company and Worley company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sargent & Lundy company and Worley company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sargent & Lundy company and Worley company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sargent & Lundy company and Worley company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sargent & Lundy company and Worley company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sargent & Lundy company and Worley company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sargent & Lundy company and Worley company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sargent & Lundy company and Worley company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sargent & Lundy company and Worley company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sargent & Lundy company and Worley company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sargent & Lundy company and Worley company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sargent & Lundy and Worley, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sargent & Lundy and Worley, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sargent & Lundy or Worley ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sargent & Lundy or Worley ?
Between Sargent & Lundy and Worley, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sargent & Lundy and Worley, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58523
SUMMARY

Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14617
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-58597
SUMMARY

Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58524
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58522
SUMMARY

Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5