Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SAP Supply Chain ManagementSAP Supply Chain Management
VS
MicrosoftMicrosoft
SAP Supply Chain Management

SAP Supply Chain Management

3999 West Chester Pike, Newtown Square, 19073, US

Last Update: 25/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://sap.to/6009ut8gz
769/1000Fair

Orchestrate your supply chain as a single, connected system using AI and data to sense, analyze, and act in real time. ​ SAP privacy statement for followers: http://www.sap.com/sps

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Microsoft

Microsoft

1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, 98052, US

Last Update: 30/07/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://news.microsoft.com/
642/1000Poor

Every company has a mission. What's ours? To empower every person and every organization to achieve more. We believe technology can and should be a force for good and that meaningful innovation contributes to a brighter world in the future and today. Our culture doesn’t...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:233,556
Subsidiaries:52
12-month incidents
17
Known data breaches
8
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SAP Supply Chain Management

SAP Supply Chain Management

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Microsoft

Microsoft

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAP Supply Chain Management in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Microsoft has 1550.49% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - SAP Supply Chain Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAP Supply Chain Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Microsoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microsoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SAP Supply Chain Management

SAP Supply Chain Management

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Microsoft

Microsoft

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MIC1784125827
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MIC1784089434
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MIC1784816949

FAQ

Between SAP Supply Chain Management company and Microsoft company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SAP Supply Chain Management company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SAP Supply Chain Management company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SAP Supply Chain Management company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SAP Supply Chain Management company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SAP Supply Chain Management company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SAP Supply Chain Management company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SAP Supply Chain Management company and Microsoft company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SAP Supply Chain Management company and Microsoft company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SAP Supply Chain Management company and Microsoft company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SAP Supply Chain Management company and Microsoft company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SAP Supply Chain Management and Microsoft, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SAP Supply Chain Management and Microsoft, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SAP Supply Chain Management or Microsoft ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SAP Supply Chain Management or Microsoft ?
Between SAP Supply Chain Management and Microsoft, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SAP Supply Chain Management and Microsoft, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA