Comparison Overview
Sapient Public Sector | Now Publicis Sapient

Sapient Public Sector | Now Publicis Sapient
1515 North Courthouse Road, Arlington, VA, 22201-2909, US
Last Update: 08/03/2026
Hello, current, past, and prospective employees and clients! This page is no longer active as we go by a different name now. In case you haven’t heard, we merged our legendary brands into one global organization back in 2019. So without further ado, welcome to Publicis ...

Publicis Sapient
40 Water St, Boston, Massachusetts, US, 02109
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Publicis Sapient is a technology company that provides enterprise AI platforms and services. With over 30 years of digital business transformation experience, we enable enterprise clients to transform how they operate and serve their customers, unlocking new value and e...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sapient Public Sector | Now Publicis Sapient







Publicis Sapient






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sapient Public Sector | Now Publicis Sapient in 2026.
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Publicis Sapient has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Sapient Public Sector | Now Publicis Sapient (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sapient Public Sector | Now Publicis Sapient cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Publicis Sapient (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Publicis Sapient cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sapient Public Sector | Now Publicis Sapient

Publicis Sapient
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
GNU Savannah Administration Savane through 3.17 uses untrusted data as part of authorization.
- https://cgit.git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/administration/savane.git/tree/frontend/php/file.php?h=release-3.17#n113
- https://cgit.git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/administration/savane.git/tree/frontend/php/file.php?h=release-3.17#n123
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48605220
- https://www.fsf.org/news/statement-regarding-gnu-savannah-security-reports
- https://www.hacktron.ai
- https://www.mallory.ai/stories/019ee445-bdd4-7775-93b5-a8faaf5c2eb7
AVideo TopMenu plugin through version 26.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in menu item rendering due to missing output encoding of icon classes, URLs, and text labels. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript through unescaped menu item fields that execute for all site visitors, potentially stealing session cookies or performing unauthorized actions.
AVideo through version 25.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the decryptMessage.json.php endpoint that allows unauthenticated users to decrypt PGP messages. Remote attackers can submit private keys, ciphertext, and passphrases to perform server-side decryption without credentials, exposing key material to logs and enabling resource exhaustion attacks.
AVideo through 29.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the Meet plugin's uploadRecordedVideo.json.php endpoint that derives the target users_id from the uploaded filename without verification. An attacker with knowledge of the Meet shared secret can craft a malicious file upload with a filename containing an arbitrary users_id to invoke passwordless User->login() and establish an authenticated session as any user including admin. Attackers can obtain the Meet shared secret through path-traversal vulnerabilities or timing attacks against checkToken.json.php, then POST a crafted file to uploadRecordedVideo.json.php with a filename like '1-anything.mp4' to hijack admin sessions and gain full account takeover.
AVideo through version 27.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in plugin/Live/test.php that allows authenticated administrators to read arbitrary URLs via the statsURL parameter, which lacks isSSRFSafeURL() validation and accepts requests to private IP ranges and cloud metadata endpoints. Attackers can exploit this by crafting requests to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints like 169.254.169.254, and localhost to retrieve sensitive information including IAM credentials, internal service responses, and network configuration details.