Comparison Overview
Sapient Global Markets

Sapient Global Markets
131 Dartmouth Street, Boston, 02116, US
Last Update: 16/02/2026
Hello, current, past, and prospective employees and clients! This page is no longer active as we go by a different name now. In case you haven’t heard, we merged our legendary brands into one global organization back in 2019. So without further ado, welcome to Publicis ...

Xerox
201 Merritt 7, Norwalk, Connecticut, US
Last Update: 19/06/2026
Xerox has been redefining the workplace experience for over a century. As a services-led, software-enabled company, we power today’s hybrid workplace through advanced print, digital, and AI-driven technologies. In 2025, Xerox acquired Lexmark—expanding our global foot...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sapient Global Markets







Xerox






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sapient Global Markets in 2026.
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Xerox in 2026.
Incident History - Sapient Global Markets (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sapient Global Markets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Xerox (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Xerox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sapient Global Markets

Xerox
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.