Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Santander Universidades - BrasilSantander Universidades - Brasil
VS
alrajhi bankalrajhi bank
Santander Universidades - Brasil

Santander Universidades - Brasil

Av. Pres. Juscelino Kubitschek - Vila Olimpia, São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, 04543011, BR

Last Update: 13/12/2025

View Profile
757/1000Fair

Seja bem-vindo à página de Santander Universidades no LinkedIn. Aqui você encontra um canal dedicado ao aprimoramento de carreira e preparação para o mercado de trabalho. Temos conteúdos, dicas e oportunidades exclusivas para o seu crescimento profissional. Você acr...

NAICS:522
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:159
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
alrajhi bank

alrajhi bank

King Fahad Branch Road, Al Rajhi Tower, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, SA, 11411

Last Update: 04/05/2026

View Profile
768/1000Fair

Founded in 1957, Al Rajhi Bank is one of the largest Islamic banks in the world with total assets of SR 384 billion (US$ 102 billion), a paid up capital of SR 25 billion (US$ 6.66 billion) and an employee base of over 9,600 associates. With over 58 years of experience i...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:13,008
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Santander Universidades - Brasil

Santander Universidades - Brasil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
alrajhi bank

alrajhi bank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Santander Universidades - Brasil in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

alrajhi bank has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Santander Universidades - Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Santander Universidades - Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - alrajhi bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

alrajhi bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Santander Universidades - Brasil

Santander Universidades - Brasil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
alrajhi bank

alrajhi bank

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BATALRABU1777926903

FAQ

Between Santander Universidades - Brasil company and alrajhi bank company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Santander Universidades - Brasil company and alrajhi bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Santander Universidades - Brasil company and alrajhi bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Santander Universidades - Brasil company and alrajhi bank company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Santander Universidades - Brasil company and alrajhi bank company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Santander Universidades - Brasil company and alrajhi bank company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Santander Universidades - Brasil company and alrajhi bank company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Santander Universidades - Brasil company and alrajhi bank company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Santander Universidades - Brasil company and alrajhi bank company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Santander Universidades - Brasil company and alrajhi bank company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Santander Universidades - Brasil company and alrajhi bank company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Santander Universidades - Brasil and alrajhi bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Santander Universidades - Brasil and alrajhi bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Santander Universidades - Brasil or alrajhi bank ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Santander Universidades - Brasil or alrajhi bank ?
Between Santander Universidades - Brasil and alrajhi bank, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Santander Universidades - Brasil and alrajhi bank, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8