Comparison Overview
Santander UK Business Banking

Santander UK Business Banking
2 Triton Square, London, NW1 3AN, GB
Last Update: 13/03/2026
Here to help your business prosper. Whether you are looking for your first customer, need support with working capital or want to trade internationally, we take the time to get to know your business and to support you with knowledge, connections, talent and internationa...

Capitec
5 Neutron Road, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, ZA, 7600
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Imagine simple, affordable banking solutions that work for you – just like it does for over 25 million South Africans. They’re banking smart, paying less and getting more value every day with us. As the country’s leading digital bank, we’re proud to have been voted th...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Santander UK Business Banking







Capitec






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Santander UK Business Banking in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Capitec in 2026.
Incident History - Santander UK Business Banking (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Santander UK Business Banking cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Capitec (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Capitec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Santander UK Business Banking

Capitec
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.