Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Santander EspañaSantander España
VS
Banco de Crédito BCPBanco de Crédito BCP
Santander España

Santander España

Calle de Juan Ignacio Luca de Tena, Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, 28027, ES

Last Update: 25/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bancosantander.es
763/1000Fair

Bienvenido a la página de LinkedIn de Banco Santander España, un banco fuerte y sólido, con un equipo que trabaja cada día en construir relaciones duraderas y de confianza con sus clientes. Aquí encontrarás información de productos y soluciones innovadores para ayud...

NAICS:522
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:2,112
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Banco de Crédito BCP

Banco de Crédito BCP

Calle Centenario 156, La Molina, Lima 12, PE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
799/1000Fair

Somos el banco peruano que desde hace más de 130 años viene liderando el sistema financiero a nivel nacional. A lo largo de todo este tiempo hemos contribuido con el desarrollo económico de nuestro país, transformando planes en realidad. Todo esto es posible gracias a...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:23,773
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Santander España

Santander España

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Banco de Crédito BCP

Banco de Crédito BCP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Santander España in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Banco de Crédito BCP in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Santander España (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Santander España cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Banco de Crédito BCP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Banco de Crédito BCP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Santander España

Santander España

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Banco de Crédito BCP

Banco de Crédito BCP

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Santander España company and Banco de Crédito BCP company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Santander España company and Banco de Crédito BCP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Santander España company and Banco de Crédito BCP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Santander España company and Banco de Crédito BCP company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Santander España company and Banco de Crédito BCP company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Santander España company and Banco de Crédito BCP company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Santander España company and Banco de Crédito BCP company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Santander España company and Banco de Crédito BCP company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Santander España company and Banco de Crédito BCP company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Santander España company and Banco de Crédito BCP company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Santander España company and Banco de Crédito BCP company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Santander España and Banco de Crédito BCP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Santander España and Banco de Crédito BCP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Santander España or Banco de Crédito BCP ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Santander España or Banco de Crédito BCP ?
Between Santander España and Banco de Crédito BCP, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Santander España and Banco de Crédito BCP, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2