Comparison Overview
Sanlam Investments

Sanlam Investments
55 Willie van Schoor Avenue, Cape Town, 7530, ZA
Last Update: 01/03/2026
With just under R1 trillion in assets under management across our retail and institutional businesses, Sanlam Investments is one of South Africa’s largest sustainability-driven asset management companies. We develop high-quality investment solutions that are different...

Prudential plc
13/F, One International Finance Centre, 1 Habour View Street, Central, HK
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We are Prudential. For Every Life, For Every Future. Prudential provides life and health insurance and asset management in Greater China, ASEAN, India and Africa. Prudential’s mission is to be the most trusted partner and protector for this generation and generations ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sanlam Investments







Prudential plc






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sanlam Investments in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Prudential plc in 2026.
Incident History - Sanlam Investments (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sanlam Investments cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Prudential plc (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Prudential plc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sanlam Investments

Prudential plc
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.