Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SangomaSangoma
VS
EEEE
Sangoma

Sangoma

100 Renfrew Drive, Suite 100, Markham, L3R9R6, CA

Last Update: 20/05/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.sangoma.com
652/1000Weak

Sangoma Technologies Corporation (TSX: STC; Nasdaq: SANG) is a global leader in essential business communications. For more than 40 years, Sangoma has provided secure, reliable, and cost-effective solutions to over 100,000 customers in more than 180 countries. Sango...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:622
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
EE

EE

London , GB

Last Update: 09/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://ee.co.uk
767/1000Fair

EE, part of BT Group, is the largest and most advanced mobile communications company in the UK, delivering mobile and fixed communications services to consumers. We run the UK's biggest and fastest mobile network, having pioneered the UK's first superfast 4G mobile se...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:12,014
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sangoma

Sangoma

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
EE

EE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sangoma in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EE in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sangoma (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sangoma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - EE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sangoma

Sangoma

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SAN537082825
🔒 Incident : Breach
SAN233080525
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SAN1779287064
EE

EE

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
EE410251223

FAQ

Between Sangoma company and EE company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sangoma company and EE company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sangoma company and EE company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sangoma company and EE company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sangoma company and EE company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sangoma company and EE company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sangoma company and EE company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sangoma company and EE company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sangoma company and EE company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sangoma company and EE company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sangoma company and EE company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sangoma and EE, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sangoma and EE, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sangoma or EE ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sangoma or EE ?
Between Sangoma and EE, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sangoma and EE, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3