Comparison Overview

Sandvik

VS

Tata Steel

Sandvik

Kungsbron 1, Stockholm, 111 22, SE
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 800 and 849

Sandvik is a global, high-tech engineering group providing solutions that enhance productivity, profitability and sustainability for the manufacturing, mining and infrastructure industries. We are at the forefront of digitalization and focus on optimizing our customers’ processes. Our world-leading offering includes equipment, tools, services and digital solutions for machining, mining, rock excavation and rock processing. In 2024, the Sandvik Group had approximately 41,000 employees, sales in more than 150 countries and revenues of about SEK 123 billion.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 33,567
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tata Steel

Bombay House, 24, Homi Mody Street, Mumbai, 400001, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849

Tata Steel group is among the top global steel companies with an annual crude steel capacity of 34 million tonnes per annum. It is one of the world's most geographically-diversified steel producers, with operations and commercial presence across the world. The group (excluding SEA operations) recorded a consolidated turnover of US $19.7 billion in the financial year ending March 31, 2020. A Great Place to Work-CertifiedTM organisation, Tata Steel Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures, is spread across five continents with an employee base of over 65,000. Tata Steel has been a part of the DJSI Emerging Markets Index since 2012 and has been consistently ranked amongst top 5 steel companies in the DJSI Corporate Sustainability Assessment since 2016. Besides being a member of ResponsibleSteelTM and worldsteel’s Climate Action Programme, Tata Steel has won several awards and recognitions including the World Economic Forum’s Global Lighthouse recognition for its Kalinganagar Plant - a first in India, and Prime Minister’s Trophy for the best performing integrated steel plant for 2016-17. The Company, ranked as India’s most valuable Metals & Mining brand by Brand Finance, received the ‘Honourable Mention’ at the National CSR Awards 2019, Steel Sustainability Champion 2019 by worldsteel, CII Greenco Star Performer Award 2019, ‘Most Ethical Company’ award 2020 from Ethisphere Institute, Best Risk Management Framework & Systems Award (2020) by CNBC TV-18, and Award for Excellence in Financial Reporting FY20 by ICAI, among several others. To know more, visit www.tatasteel.com and www.wealsomaketomorrow.com.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 56,276
Subsidiaries: 76
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandvik.jpeg
Sandvik
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tatasteelltd.jpeg
Tata Steel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sandvik
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tata Steel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sandvik in 2026.

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Steel in 2026.

Incident History — Sandvik (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sandvik cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tata Steel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Steel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandvik.jpeg
Sandvik
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tatasteelltd.jpeg
Tata Steel
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized AI Tool Usage, No-Code AI Agents, Third-Party AI Service Integration, Misconfigured Cloud Access (e.g., AWS), Zero-Click AI Exploits (e.g., 'Shadow Escape')
Motivation: Productivity Gains, Task Automation, Competitive Edge, Lack of Awareness About Risks, Financial Gain (for Cybercriminals)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Intellectual Property Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sandvik company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tata Steel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tata Steel company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Sandvik company has not reported any.

In the current year, Tata Steel company and Sandvik company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Tata Steel company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Sandvik company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tata Steel company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Sandvik company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tata Steel company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Sandvik company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sandvik company nor Tata Steel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sandvik nor Tata Steel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tata Steel company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sandvik company.

Tata Steel company employs more people globally than Sandvik company, reflecting its scale as a Mining.

Neither Sandvik nor Tata Steel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sandvik nor Tata Steel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sandvik nor Tata Steel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sandvik nor Tata Steel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sandvik nor Tata Steel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sandvik nor Tata Steel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H