Comparison Overview

Sandvik

VS

Orica

Sandvik

Kungsbron 1, Stockholm, 111 22, SE
Last Update: 2026-01-20
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://home.sandvik

Sandvik is a global, high-tech engineering group providing solutions that enhance productivity, profitability and sustainability for the manufacturing, mining and infrastructure industries. We are at the forefront of digitalization and focus on optimizing our customers’ processes. Our world-leading offering includes equipment, tools, services and digital solutions for machining, mining, rock excavation and rock processing. In 2024, the Sandvik Group had approximately 41,000 employees, sales in more than 150 countries and revenues of about SEK 123 billion.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 33,567
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Orica

1 Nicholson St, East Melbourne, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.orica.com

Our story began in 1874, when we first supplied explosives to the Victorian goldfields in Australia. Since then, we have grown to become one of the world’s leading mining and infrastructure solutions providers. From the production and supply of explosives, blasting systems, mining chemicals and geotechnical monitoring to our cutting-edge digital solutions and comprehensive range of services, we sustainably mobilise the earth’s resources. With 150 years of expertise, our 14,000+ community of engineers, scientists, technologists, operators, business specialists and on-site crew support customers in surface and underground mines, quarry, construction, and oil and gas operations. Sustainability is integral to our operations. Our approach to sustainability begins with ensuring we operate our business responsibly, and by prioritising the safety of our people, customers, and communities. We are in a unique position to leverage our expertise in technology to create safer and more responsible solutions and deliver positive economic, social, and environmental contributions through our business activities.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 11,057
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandvik.jpeg
Sandvik
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orica.jpeg
Orica
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sandvik
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Orica
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sandvik in 2026.

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orica in 2026.

Incident History — Sandvik (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sandvik cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Orica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandvik.jpeg
Sandvik
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orica.jpeg
Orica
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sandvik company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Orica company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Orica company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sandvik company.

In the current year, Orica company and Sandvik company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Orica company nor Sandvik company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Orica company nor Sandvik company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Orica company nor Sandvik company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sandvik company nor Orica company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sandvik nor Orica holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sandvik company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Orica company.

Sandvik company employs more people globally than Orica company, reflecting its scale as a Mining.

Neither Sandvik nor Orica holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sandvik nor Orica holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sandvik nor Orica holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sandvik nor Orica holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sandvik nor Orica holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sandvik nor Orica holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References