Comparison Overview

Sandvik

VS

First Quantum Minerals

Sandvik

Kungsbron 1, Stockholm, 111 22, SE
Last Update: 2026-01-20
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://home.sandvik

Sandvik is a global, high-tech engineering group providing solutions that enhance productivity, profitability and sustainability for the manufacturing, mining and infrastructure industries. We are at the forefront of digitalization and focus on optimizing our customers’ processes. Our world-leading offering includes equipment, tools, services and digital solutions for machining, mining, rock excavation and rock processing. In 2024, the Sandvik Group had approximately 41,000 employees, sales in more than 150 countries and revenues of about SEK 123 billion.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 33,567
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

First Quantum Minerals

8th Floor – 543 Granville Street, Canada V6C 1X8, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 800 and 849
http://www.first-quantum.com/

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is a global mining company producing copper and nickel, as well as gold and cobalt. Our growing portfolio of operations and projects spans four continents and employs around 20,000 people. We are well-known for our ‘can do’ attitude and specialist technical, project management, engineering, construction and operational skills, which allow us to develop and successfully run complex mines and minerals processing plants. We strive to go beyond the goals set by other companies. After 25 years of operations we are now one of the world’s top 10 copper producers and we focus on providing a tangible benefit from everything we do for employees, investors and the many communities that host our operations. From our initial operation reprocessing tailings facilities in Zambia, to the recently completed giant Cobre Panama operation, we have recorded many significant commercial and technical achievements over the past two decades. By 2021, the combined output of our mines will be more than 800,000 tonnes of copper per year.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 12,295
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandvik.jpeg
Sandvik
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/firstquantumminerals.jpeg
First Quantum Minerals
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sandvik
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
First Quantum Minerals
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sandvik in 2026.

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First Quantum Minerals in 2026.

Incident History — Sandvik (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sandvik cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — First Quantum Minerals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

First Quantum Minerals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandvik.jpeg
Sandvik
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/firstquantumminerals.jpeg
First Quantum Minerals
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sandvik company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to First Quantum Minerals company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, First Quantum Minerals company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sandvik company.

In the current year, First Quantum Minerals company and Sandvik company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither First Quantum Minerals company nor Sandvik company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither First Quantum Minerals company nor Sandvik company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither First Quantum Minerals company nor Sandvik company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sandvik company nor First Quantum Minerals company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sandvik nor First Quantum Minerals holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sandvik company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to First Quantum Minerals company.

Sandvik company employs more people globally than First Quantum Minerals company, reflecting its scale as a Mining.

Neither Sandvik nor First Quantum Minerals holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sandvik nor First Quantum Minerals holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sandvik nor First Quantum Minerals holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sandvik nor First Quantum Minerals holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sandvik nor First Quantum Minerals holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sandvik nor First Quantum Minerals holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References