Comparison Overview

Sandvik

VS

BHP

Sandvik

Kungsbron 1, Stockholm, 111 22, SE
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 800 and 849

Sandvik is a global, high-tech engineering group providing solutions that enhance productivity, profitability and sustainability for the manufacturing, mining and infrastructure industries. We are at the forefront of digitalization and focus on optimizing our customers’ processes. Our world-leading offering includes equipment, tools, services and digital solutions for machining, mining, rock excavation and rock processing. In 2024, the Sandvik Group had approximately 41,000 employees, sales in more than 150 countries and revenues of about SEK 123 billion.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 33,567
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BHP

171 Collins Street, Melbourne, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 800 and 849

We are supplying the resources the world needs to help build a better, clearer future. Copper for renewable energy. Potash for sustainable farming. Iron ore and metallurgical coal for the steel needed for global infrastructure and the energy transition. #FutureIsClear Across our global operations, we are committed to working in ways that are true to our BHP Charter values of Sustainability, Integrity, Respect, Performance, Simplicity and Accountability. Learn more about working at BHP and the exciting career opportunities that exist for professionals, undergraduates and graduates on our website: www.bhp.com.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 40,388
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandvik.jpeg
Sandvik
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bhp.jpeg
BHP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sandvik
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BHP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sandvik in 2026.

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BHP in 2026.

Incident History — Sandvik (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sandvik cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BHP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BHP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandvik.jpeg
Sandvik
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bhp.jpeg
BHP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BHP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sandvik company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BHP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sandvik company.

In the current year, BHP company and Sandvik company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BHP company nor Sandvik company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BHP company nor Sandvik company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BHP company nor Sandvik company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sandvik company nor BHP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sandvik nor BHP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sandvik company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to BHP company.

BHP company employs more people globally than Sandvik company, reflecting its scale as a Mining.

Neither Sandvik nor BHP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sandvik nor BHP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sandvik nor BHP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sandvik nor BHP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sandvik nor BHP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sandvik nor BHP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H