Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sandoz Australia & New ZealandSandoz Australia & New Zealand
VS
Alembic Pharmaceuticals LimitedAlembic Pharmaceuticals Limited
Sandoz Australia & New Zealand

Sandoz Australia & New Zealand

North Sydney , 2060, AU

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sandoz.com.au
752/1000Fair

Sandoz Australia & New Zealand is an affiliate of Sandoz AG (SIX: SDZ; OTCQX: SDZNY), the global leader in generic and biosimilar medicines with a growth strategy driven by its Purpose: pioneering access for patients. More than 20,000 people of 100 nationalities work to...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:74
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited

Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited

Alembic Road, Vadodara, 390003, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.alembic-india.com
757/1000Fair

Established in 1907, Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited is a leading pharmaceutical company in India. The Company is vertically integrated with the ability to develop, manufacture and market pharmaceutical products, pharmaceutical substances and Intermediates. Alembic is t...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:14,168
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sandoz Australia & New Zealand

Sandoz Australia & New Zealand

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited

Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sandoz Australia & New Zealand in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sandoz Australia & New Zealand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sandoz Australia & New Zealand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sandoz Australia & New Zealand

Sandoz Australia & New Zealand

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited

Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sandoz Australia & New Zealand company and Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sandoz Australia & New Zealand company and Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sandoz Australia & New Zealand company and Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sandoz Australia & New Zealand company and Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sandoz Australia & New Zealand company and Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sandoz Australia & New Zealand company and Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sandoz Australia & New Zealand company and Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sandoz Australia & New Zealand company and Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sandoz Australia & New Zealand company and Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sandoz Australia & New Zealand company and Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sandoz Australia & New Zealand company and Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sandoz Australia & New Zealand and Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sandoz Australia & New Zealand and Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sandoz Australia & New Zealand or Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sandoz Australia & New Zealand or Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited ?
Between Sandoz Australia & New Zealand and Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sandoz Australia & New Zealand and Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1