Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

San Diego State UniversitySan Diego State University
VS
Virginia TechVirginia Tech
San Diego State University

San Diego State University

5500 Campanile Dr, San Diego, CA, 92182, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sdsu.edu/
798/1000Fair

Founded in 1897, San Diego State University is a major public research institution that provides transformative experiences for its more than 36,000 students. SDSU ranks as the number 1 California State University in federal research support, is a long-standing Hispanic...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:9,321
Subsidiaries:40
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Virginia Tech

Virginia Tech

800 Drillfield Drive, Blacksburg, 24061, US

Last Update: 08/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vt.edu
770/1000Fair

Dedicated to its motto, Ut Prosim (That I May Serve), Virginia Tech takes a hands-on, engaging approach to education, preparing scholars to be leaders in their fields and communities. As the commonwealth’s most comprehensive university and its leading research instituti...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:15,651
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
San Diego State University

San Diego State University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Virginia Tech

Virginia Tech

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for San Diego State University in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Virginia Tech has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - San Diego State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

San Diego State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Virginia Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Virginia Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
San Diego State University

San Diego State University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Virginia Tech

Virginia Tech

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CANVIR1778280319

FAQ

Between San Diego State University company and Virginia Tech company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between San Diego State University company and Virginia Tech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between San Diego State University company and Virginia Tech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between San Diego State University company and Virginia Tech company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between San Diego State University company and Virginia Tech company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between San Diego State University company and Virginia Tech company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between San Diego State University company and Virginia Tech company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between San Diego State University company and Virginia Tech company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between San Diego State University company and Virginia Tech company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between San Diego State University company and Virginia Tech company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between San Diego State University company and Virginia Tech company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between San Diego State University and Virginia Tech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between San Diego State University and Virginia Tech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - San Diego State University or Virginia Tech ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - San Diego State University or Virginia Tech ?
Between San Diego State University and Virginia Tech, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between San Diego State University and Virginia Tech, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2