Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS)Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS)
VS
ParexelParexel
Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS)

Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS)

C-1, A & B , Sector -1, Noida, U.P., 201301, IN

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

We are part of Samvardhana Motherson Group (SMG), one of the most diversified auto ancillary Groups headquartered in India with a global footprint. A key supplier to all major car manufacturers in the world, the USD 11.5 billion Group provides integrated full system sol...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:46
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Parexel

Parexel

541 Church at North Hills St, 1000, Raleigh, North Carolina, US, 27609

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.parexel.com
795/1000Fair

Parexel is a leading global clinical research organization (CRO) providing insights-driven Clinical and Consulting solutions to the world’s life sciences industry. Leveraging deep local knowledge and a global breadth of clinical, regulatory and therapeutic expertise, ou...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:20,434
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS)

Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Parexel

Parexel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Parexel in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Parexel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Parexel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS)

Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Parexel

Parexel

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ORAPAR1766015901

FAQ

Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Parexel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Parexel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Parexel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Parexel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Parexel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Parexel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Parexel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Parexel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Parexel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Parexel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Parexel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) and Parexel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) and Parexel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) or Parexel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) or Parexel ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) and Parexel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) and Parexel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3