Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS)Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS)
VS
MerckMerck
Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS)

Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS)

C-1, A & B , Sector -1, Noida, U.P., 201301, IN

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

We are part of Samvardhana Motherson Group (SMG), one of the most diversified auto ancillary Groups headquartered in India with a global footprint. A key supplier to all major car manufacturers in the world, the USD 11.5 billion Group provides integrated full system sol...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:46
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Merck

Merck

126 E Lincoln Ave, P.O. Box 2000, Rahway, New Jersey, US, 07065

Last Update: 05/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://merck.us/2J2xAUh
802/1000Good

At Merck, known as MSD outside of the United States and Canada, we are unified around our purpose: We use the power of leading-edge science to save and improve lives around the world. For more than 130 years, we have brought hope to humanity through the development of i...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:44,762
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS)

Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Merck

Merck

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Merck in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Merck (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Merck cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS)

Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Merck

Merck

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MER3502435111825
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MER1775377932
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MER1502422

FAQ

Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Merck company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Merck company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Merck company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Merck company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Merck company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Merck company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Merck company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Merck company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Merck company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Merck company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) company and Merck company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) and Merck, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) and Merck, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) or Merck ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) or Merck ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) and Merck, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Samvardhana Motherson Health Solution Limited (SMHS) and Merck, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1