Comparison Overview

Samsung Semiconductor

VS

Intel Corporation

Samsung Semiconductor

None
Last Update: 2026-01-20
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://semiconductor.samsung.com/

Established in 1974 as a subsidiary of Samsung Electronics, we’re proud to be recognized as one of the leading chip manufacturers in the world. Using our knowledge in semiconductor technology, our ambition is to spark the imagination of device manufacturers with top-of-the-line building blocks and, through that, enrich the lives of people around the world with transformative solutions.

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 9,594
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Intel Corporation

Robert Noyce Building, Santa Clara, 95052, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.intel.com

Our mission is to shape the future of technology to help create a better future for the entire world, that’s the power of Intel Inside. With more ingenuity and creativity inside, our work is at the heart of countless innovations. From major breakthroughs to things that make everyday life better— they’re all powered by Intel technology. With a career at Intel, you can help make the future more wonderful for everyone. • Need help or have a support question? Visit Intel Support: http://ms.spr.ly/6054tmaop

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 110,351
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/samsungsemiconductor.jpeg
Samsung Semiconductor
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intel-corporation.jpeg
Intel Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Samsung Semiconductor
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Intel Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Samsung Semiconductor in 2026.

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intel Corporation in 2026.

Incident History — Samsung Semiconductor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Samsung Semiconductor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Intel Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intel Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/samsungsemiconductor.jpeg
Samsung Semiconductor
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malicious Image Files, Closed-Source Library Exploitation (libimagecodec.quram.so)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intel-corporation.jpeg
Intel Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Hardware-based memory manipulation
Motivation: Security Research / Proof of Concept
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Local Privilege Escalation, Cross-Tenant Data Theft in Cloud Environments, Memory Cache Exploitation
Motivation: Data Theft, Espionage, Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Information
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Authentication Bypass, Hardcoded Credentials, Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR)
Motivation: Research/Disclosure (Ethical)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Samsung Semiconductor company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Intel Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Intel Corporation company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Samsung Semiconductor company.

In the current year, Intel Corporation company and Samsung Semiconductor company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Intel Corporation company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Samsung Semiconductor company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Intel Corporation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Samsung Semiconductor company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Intel Corporation company nor Samsung Semiconductor company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Both Samsung Semiconductor company and Intel Corporation company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither Samsung Semiconductor nor Intel Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Intel Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Samsung Semiconductor company.

Intel Corporation company employs more people globally than Samsung Semiconductor company, reflecting its scale as a Semiconductor Manufacturing.

Neither Samsung Semiconductor nor Intel Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Samsung Semiconductor nor Intel Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Samsung Semiconductor nor Intel Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Samsung Semiconductor nor Intel Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Samsung Semiconductor nor Intel Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Samsung Semiconductor nor Intel Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References