Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Samsung Knox

Samsung Knox Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

samsungknox.com

Sécurisez, déployez et gérez facilement votre parc d’appareils, tout en permettant à vos employés de rester productifs ! Une chose est sûre, grâce à l’écosystème Samsung Knox, vous allez pouvoir vous concentrer sur l’essentiel : votre activité.


Samsung Knox A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Samsung Knox
Company Information
Website:https://www.samsungknox.com/fr/
Employees number:None
Number of followers:0
NAICS:
Industry Type:Information Technology & Services
Homepage:samsungknox.com
Samsung Knox Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 750 and 799
logo
Samsung KnoxInformation Technology & Services
Updated:
23/06/2026
768/1000
Fair
Baa
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Samsung Knox Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
Samsung KnoxInformation Technology & Services
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Samsung Knox
Samsung KnoxFair
Current Score
768Baa (FAIR)
01000
1 incidents
-4 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
769Before Incident
JULY 2026
769Before Incident
JUNE 2026
768Before Incident
MAY 2026
768Before Incident
APRIL 2026
768Before Incident
MARCH 2026
768Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
768Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
772Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Jan 2026Samsung Knox
Samsung: 8-Year-Old Samsung KNOX Vulnerability Exposes Galaxy Devices to Kernel Attacks

Eight-Year-Old Samsung KNOX Flaw Exposed Millions of Galaxy Devices to Kernel-Level Takeover

768After Incident
CRITICAL-4
SAM1782231942
Eight-Year-Old Samsung KNOX Flaw Exposed Millions of Galaxy Devices to Kernel-Level Takeover Security researchers at LucidBit have uncovered a critical use-after-free (UAF) vulnerability in Samsung’s KNOX security subsystem, a flaw that remained hidden for over eight years and could have enabled full device compromise. The bug, patched in Samsung’s January 2026 Android Security Update, affects the PROCA (Process Authenticator) component of KNOX, specifically targeting FIVE (File-based Integrity Verification Engine), a kernel-level integrity tracking system built on Linux’s integrity measurement architecture. The vulnerability stems from improper reference handling in procfs handlers under `/proc/pid/integrity/`, which fetch raw pointers to `task_integrity` objects without maintaining proper locks. This oversight in a preemptive kernel environment allowed attackers to exploit freed memory, leading to potential kernel-level memory corruption and device takeover. ### Affected Devices & Scope The flaw impacts Samsung Galaxy devices from the S9 through S25, including A-series models (e.g., A54), across both Exynos and Qualcomm chipsets. All tested Android versions were vulnerable, with the bug dating back to 2017, when FIVE was first integrated into Samsung’s kernel. ### Exploitation Primitives LucidBit identified three distinct attack vectors from the UAF condition: 1. Memory Leak (DWORD Read) – The `proc_integrity_value_read()` handler could leak data from reclaimed memory, enabling a KASLR bypass without crashing the system. 2. Arbitrary Call (CFI-Blocked) – The `proc_integrity_reset_file()` handler could trigger a function pointer call via a freed `struct file`, but Android’s KCFI (Kernel Control Flow Integrity) restricted redirection to type-compatible functions, neutralizing this vector. 3. Constrained Write via Spinlock – The `proc_integrity_label_read()` handler’s spinlock operations on freed memory could produce a write at offset 0x0c, potentially corrupting pointers or refcounts in reclaimed objects. ### Patch & Mitigation Samsung addressed the flaw in its January 2026 security update, with affected users advised to verify their security patch level (2026-01-01 or later). The discovery highlights the risks of vendor-modified kernel code, where complex object lifetime semantics absent in upstream Linux can introduce long-term vulnerabilities.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability Exploitation
IMPACT
Systems Affected: Millions of Samsung Galaxy devicesOperational Impact: Potential full device compromiseBrand Reputation Impact: High (Samsung KNOX security reputation)Identity Theft Risk: Potential (if exploited)Payment Information Risk: Potential (if exploited)
DATA BREACH
Sensitivity Of Data: Potential kernel-level access (high sensitivity)Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (if exploited)
DECEMBER 2025
772Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
772Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
772Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
772Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Samsung Knox ?
?
What was Samsung Knox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was Samsung Knox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was Samsung Knox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Samsung Knox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Samsung Knox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Samsung Knox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Samsung Knox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Samsung Knox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Samsung Knox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Samsung Knox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Samsung Knox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Samsung Knox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Samsung Knox ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Samsung Knox's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?