Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Samsung KnoxSamsung Knox
VS
ComputacenterComputacenter
Samsung Knox

Samsung Knox

N/A

Last Update: 23/06/2026

View Profile
768/1000Fair

Sécurisez, déployez et gérez facilement votre parc d’appareils, tout en permettant à vos employés de rester productifs ! Une chose est sûre, grâce à l’écosystème Samsung Knox, vous allez pouvoir vous concentrer sur l’essentiel : votre activité.

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:37
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Computacenter

Computacenter

Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, GB, AL10 9TW

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.computacenter.com
759/1000Fair

Computacenter is a leading independent technology and services provider, trusted by large corporate and public sector organisations. We are a responsible business that believes in winning together for our people and our planet. We help our customers to Source, Tran...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:19,537
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Samsung Knox

Samsung Knox

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Computacenter

Computacenter

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Samsung Knox has 46.24% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Computacenter in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Samsung Knox (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Samsung Knox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Computacenter (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Computacenter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Samsung Knox

Samsung Knox

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SAM1782231942
Computacenter

Computacenter

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
COM224219323

FAQ

Between Samsung Knox company and Computacenter company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Samsung Knox company and Computacenter company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Samsung Knox company and Computacenter company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Samsung Knox company and Computacenter company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Samsung Knox company and Computacenter company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Samsung Knox company and Computacenter company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Samsung Knox company and Computacenter company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Samsung Knox company and Computacenter company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Samsung Knox company and Computacenter company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Samsung Knox company and Computacenter company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Samsung Knox company and Computacenter company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Samsung Knox and Computacenter, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Samsung Knox and Computacenter, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Samsung Knox or Computacenter ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Samsung Knox or Computacenter ?
Between Samsung Knox and Computacenter, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Samsung Knox and Computacenter, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9