Comparison Overview
Samsung Knox

Samsung Knox
N/A
Last Update: 23/06/2026
Sécurisez, déployez et gérez facilement votre parc d’appareils, tout en permettant à vos employés de rester productifs ! Une chose est sûre, grâce à l’écosystème Samsung Knox, vous allez pouvoir vous concentrer sur l’essentiel : votre activité.

Computacenter
Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, GB, AL10 9TW
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Computacenter is a leading independent technology and services provider, trusted by large corporate and public sector organisations. We are a responsible business that believes in winning together for our people and our planet. We help our customers to Source, Tran...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Samsung Knox







Computacenter






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Samsung Knox has 46.24% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Computacenter in 2026.
Incident History - Samsung Knox (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Samsung Knox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Computacenter (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Computacenter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Samsung Knox

Computacenter
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.