Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Samsung GreeceSamsung Greece
VS
Voltas Limited - A TATA EnterpriseVoltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise
Samsung Greece

Samsung Greece

Leof. Kifisias 24A, Marousi, 15125, GR

Last Update: 24/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.samsung.com/gr/
752/1000Fair

Samsung Electronics is a global leader in technology, opening new possibilities for people everywhere. Through relentless innovation and discovery, we are transforming the worlds of TVs, smartphones, wearable devices, tablets, digital appliances, network systems, medica...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:43
Subsidiaries:41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Voltas House , A Block, Chinchpokli, Mumbai, Mumbai, 400033, IN

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.voltas.com/
796/1000Fair

Voltas is the No. 1* Room Air Conditioner Brand in India. Apart from ACs, Voltas offers a wide range of cooling products including Air Coolers, Commercial Refrigeration, Water Coolers and Water Dispensers. Apart from being the leaders in consumer products, Voltas is als...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:14,055
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Samsung Greece

Samsung Greece

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Samsung Greece in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Samsung Greece (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Samsung Greece cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Samsung Greece

Samsung Greece

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Samsung Greece company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Samsung Greece company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Samsung Greece company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Samsung Greece company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Samsung Greece company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Samsung Greece company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Samsung Greece company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Samsung Greece company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Samsung Greece company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Samsung Greece company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Samsung Greece company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Samsung Greece and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Samsung Greece and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Samsung Greece or Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Samsung Greece or Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise ?
Between Samsung Greece and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Samsung Greece and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1