Comparison Overview

Samsung Electronics America

VS

HARMAN International

Samsung Electronics America

700 Sylvan Ave, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, US, 07632
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.samsung.com/us/

Headquartered in Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (SEA), the U.S. Sales and Marketing subsidiary, is a leader in mobile technologies, consumer electronics, home appliances, enterprise solutions and networks systems. For more than four decades, Samsung has driven innovation, economic growth and workforce opportunity across the United States—investing over $100 billion and employing more than 20,000 people nationwide. By integrating our large portfolio of products, services and AI technology, we’re creating smarter, sustainable and more connected experiences that empower people to live better. SEA is a wholly owned subsidiary of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

NAICS: 334
NAICS Definition: Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees: 10,045
Subsidiaries: 41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
3
View Profile

HARMAN International

400 Atlantic St, Stamford, Connecticut, 06901, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.harman.com

Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, HARMAN (harman.com) designs and engineers connected products and solutions for automakers, consumers, and enterprises worldwide, including connected car systems, audio and visual products, enterprise automation solutions; and services supporting the Internet of Things. With leading brands including AKG®, Harman Kardon®, Infinity®, JBL®, Lexicon®, Mark Levinson® and Revel®, HARMAN is admired by audiophiles, musicians and the entertainment venues where they perform around the world. More than 50 million automobiles on the road today are equipped with HARMAN audio and connected car systems. Our software services power billions of mobile devices and systems that are connected, integrated and secure across all platforms, from work and home to car and mobile. HARMAN has a workforce of approximately 30,000 people across the Americas, Europe, and Asia. In March 2017, HARMAN became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. HARMAN is an Equal Opportunity, Affirmative Action employer. Minorities, women, veterans and individuals with disabilities are encouraged to apply. HARMAN offers a great work environment, challenging career opportunities, professional training and competitive compensation. Looking for a challenge where your experience is valued? Come see what you can achieve as a leader with HARMAN!

NAICS: 334
NAICS Definition: Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees: 27,692
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/samsung-electronics-america.jpeg
Samsung Electronics America
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harman-international.jpeg
HARMAN International
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Samsung Electronics America
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HARMAN International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Samsung Electronics America in 2025.

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HARMAN International in 2025.

Incident History — Samsung Electronics America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Samsung Electronics America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HARMAN International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HARMAN International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/samsung-electronics-america.jpeg
Samsung Electronics America
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malicious Image Files, Closed-Source Library Exploitation (libimagecodec.quram.so)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Unauthorized disclosure of confidential information
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harman-international.jpeg
HARMAN International
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

HARMAN International company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Samsung Electronics America company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Samsung Electronics America company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas HARMAN International company has not reported any.

In the current year, Samsung Electronics America company has reported more cyber incidents than HARMAN International company.

Neither HARMAN International company nor Samsung Electronics America company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Samsung Electronics America company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other HARMAN International company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither HARMAN International company nor Samsung Electronics America company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Samsung Electronics America company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while HARMAN International company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Samsung Electronics America nor HARMAN International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Samsung Electronics America company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to HARMAN International company.

HARMAN International company employs more people globally than Samsung Electronics America company, reflecting its scale as a Computers and Electronics Manufacturing.

Neither Samsung Electronics America nor HARMAN International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Samsung Electronics America nor HARMAN International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Samsung Electronics America nor HARMAN International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Samsung Electronics America nor HARMAN International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Samsung Electronics America nor HARMAN International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Samsung Electronics America nor HARMAN International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References