Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Samsung Electronics RomaniaSamsung Electronics Romania
VS
Bharat Heavy Electricals LimitedBharat Heavy Electricals Limited
Samsung Electronics Romania

Samsung Electronics Romania

Wllbrook Platinum Center, Sos. Bucuresti - Ploiesti, nr 172-176, București, 013686, RO

Last Update: 24/01/2026

View Profile
748/1000Moderate

Bine ați venit pe pagina oficială Samsung Electronics România. De peste 70 de ani, suntem aici să creăm o lume mai bună şi să ducem afacerile la nivelul următor prin tehnologie. Prin produsele şi serviciile inovatoare, fiabile, prin oamenii talentaţi, prin abordarea res...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:190
Subsidiaries:41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Siri Fort Road, New Delhi, 110049, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bhel.com
783/1000Fair

Established in 1964, BHEL is one of India's largest engineering and manufacturing enterprises in the energy and infrastructure sectors, and a leading power equipment manufacturer globally. BHEL serves the core sectors of the economy and provides a comprehensive portfoli...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:21,195
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Samsung Electronics Romania

Samsung Electronics Romania

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Samsung Electronics Romania in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Samsung Electronics Romania (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Samsung Electronics Romania cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Samsung Electronics Romania

Samsung Electronics Romania

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Samsung Electronics Romania company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Samsung Electronics Romania company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Samsung Electronics Romania company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Samsung Electronics Romania company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Samsung Electronics Romania company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Samsung Electronics Romania company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Samsung Electronics Romania company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Samsung Electronics Romania company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Samsung Electronics Romania company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Samsung Electronics Romania company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Samsung Electronics Romania company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Samsung Electronics Romania and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Samsung Electronics Romania and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Samsung Electronics Romania or Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Samsung Electronics Romania or Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited ?
Between Samsung Electronics Romania and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Samsung Electronics Romania and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58281
SUMMARY

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-10660
SUMMARY

The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-61870
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.4
CVE-2026-61861
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-61858
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8