Comparison Overview
Sampla

Sampla
Via Privata S.P. 215, , ITALY, Caponago (MB), undefined, 20867, IT
Last Update: 14/12/2025
Sampla has been manufacturing lightweight conveyor belts and accessories for over 50 years thanks to our founders’ vision and employees’ fortitude. From PVC and TPU belts produced in Italy, today our strategically located manufacturing facilities can be active also on ...

PT Astra International Tbk
Jl. Jenderal Sudirman, Kav-5-6, Central Jakarta, 10220, ID
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Astra was established in 1957 as a trading company. Over the course of its development, Astra has formed a number of strategic alliances with leading global players. Since 1990, the Company has been listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Astra currently engages ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sampla







PT Astra International Tbk






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sampla in 2026.
Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for PT Astra International Tbk in 2026.
Incident History - Sampla (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sampla cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PT Astra International Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PT Astra International Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sampla

PT Astra International Tbk
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.