Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SAMEN – IOM The NetherlandsSAMEN – IOM The Netherlands
VS
Boys & Girls Clubs of AmericaBoys & Girls Clubs of America
SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands

SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands

The Hague, NL

Last Update: 17/01/2026

View Profile
779/1000Fair

Welcome to the SAMEN Linkedin page. SAMEN prevents and combats sexual and gender-based violence experienced by migrant communities in the Netherlands. IOM the Netherlands and Dokters van de Wereld work with the target group to achieve this goal. Follow us for all projec...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:70
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Boys & Girls Clubs of America

Boys & Girls Clubs of America

1275 Peachtree St NE, Atlanta, Georgia, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bgca.org
783/1000Fair

Boys & Girls Clubs of America does whatever it takes for America’s youth to have great futures. As the nation's premier (nonprofit) youth development organization, our programs, training and services support millions of kids and teens every year. We hire employees who ...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,959
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands

SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Boys & Girls Clubs of America

Boys & Girls Clubs of America

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boys & Girls Clubs of America in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Boys & Girls Clubs of America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boys & Girls Clubs of America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands

SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Boys & Girls Clubs of America

Boys & Girls Clubs of America

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands company and Boys & Girls Clubs of America company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands and Boys & Girls Clubs of America, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands and Boys & Girls Clubs of America, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands or Boys & Girls Clubs of America ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands or Boys & Girls Clubs of America ?
Between SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands and Boys & Girls Clubs of America, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SAMEN – IOM The Netherlands and Boys & Girls Clubs of America, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA