Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SalesforceSalesforce
VS
[24]7.ai[24]7.ai
Salesforce

Salesforce

415 Mission St, San Francisco, 94105, US

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.salesforce.com
100/1000Critical

We're the #1 AI CRM—where humans with agents drive customer success together with AI, data, and Customer 360 apps on one platform. Privacy Statement: http://www.salesforce.com/company/privacy/

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:85,366
Subsidiaries:46
12-month incidents
40
Known data breaches
33
Attack type number
4
[24]7.ai

[24]7.ai

2105 S Bascom Ave, Campbell, 95008, US

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.247.ai/
778/1000Fair

[24]7.ai™ customer engagement solutions use conversational artificial intelligence to understand customer intent, enabling companies to create personalized, predictive, and effortless customer experiences across all channels; attract and retain customers; boost agent pr...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:11,282
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Salesforce

Salesforce

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
[24]7.ai

[24]7.ai

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Salesforce has 3673.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for [24]7.ai in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Salesforce (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Salesforce cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - [24]7.ai (X = Date, Y = Severity)

[24]7.ai cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Salesforce

Salesforce

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
OPESNOSALHUG1789396374
🔒 Incident : Breach
SALMCK1787948754
🔒 Incident : Breach
CISRESMICAMASERSALGIT1786868753
[24]7.ai

[24]7.ai

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Salesforce company and [24]7.ai company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Salesforce company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Salesforce company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Salesforce company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Salesforce company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Salesforce company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Salesforce company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Salesforce company and [24]7.ai company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Salesforce company and [24]7.ai company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Salesforce company and [24]7.ai company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Salesforce company and [24]7.ai company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Salesforce and [24]7.ai, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Salesforce and [24]7.ai, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Salesforce or [24]7.ai ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Salesforce or [24]7.ai ?
Between Salesforce and [24]7.ai, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Salesforce and [24]7.ai, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3