Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SaipemSaipem
VS
L&T Technology ServicesL&T Technology Services
Saipem

Saipem

Via Luigi Russolo, 5, Milan, 20138, IT

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.saipem.com
776/1000Fair

Saipem is a global leader in the engineering and construction of major projects for the energy and infrastructure sectors, both offshore and onshore. Saipem is “One Company” organized into business lines: Asset Based Services, Drilling, Energy Carriers, Offshore Wind, S...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:26,852
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
L&T Technology Services

L&T Technology Services

L&T Knowledge City, West Block, Vadodara, Gujarat, 390019, IN

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.Ltts.com
764/1000Fair

L&T Technology Services (LTTS) is one of the world’s leading engineering and technology service providers. With operations in over 25 countries and a growing annual revenue that now surpasses USD 1.2 billion, we work with organizations who design, develop or deliver p...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:39,594
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Saipem

Saipem

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
L&T Technology Services

L&T Technology Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saipem in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L&T Technology Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Saipem (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saipem cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - L&T Technology Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L&T Technology Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Saipem

Saipem

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
L&T Technology Services

L&T Technology Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Saipem company and L&T Technology Services company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Saipem company and L&T Technology Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Saipem company and L&T Technology Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Saipem company and L&T Technology Services company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Saipem company and L&T Technology Services company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Saipem company and L&T Technology Services company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Saipem company and L&T Technology Services company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Saipem company and L&T Technology Services company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Saipem company and L&T Technology Services company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Saipem company and L&T Technology Services company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Saipem company and L&T Technology Services company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Saipem and L&T Technology Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Saipem and L&T Technology Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Saipem or L&T Technology Services ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Saipem or L&T Technology Services ?
Between Saipem and L&T Technology Services, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Saipem and L&T Technology Services, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA