Comparison Overview

Saipem

VS

L&T Technology Services

Saipem

Via Luigi Russolo, 5, Milan, Lombardy, 20138, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Saipem is a global leader in the engineering and construction of major projects for the energy and infrastructure sectors, both offshore and onshore. Saipem is “One Company” organized into business lines: Asset Based Services, Drilling, Energy Carriers, Offshore Wind, Sustainable Infrastructures, Robotics & Industrialized Solutions. The company has 6 fabrication yards and an offshore fleet of 17 construction vessels owned and 15 drilling rigs, of which 9 owned. Always oriented towards technological innovation, the company’s purpose is “Engineering for a sustainable future”. As such Saipem is committed to supporting its clients on the energy transition pathway towards Net Zero, with increasingly digital means, technologies and processes geared for environmental sustainability. Listed on the Milan Stock Exchange, it is present in more than 50 countries around the world and employs about 30,000 people of over 120 nationalities.

NAICS: 54139
NAICS Definition: Engineering Services
Employees: 25,391
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

L&T Technology Services

L&T Knowledge City, West Block, Vadodara, Gujarat, 390019, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

L&T Technology Services (LTTS) is one of the world’s leading engineering and technology service providers. With operations in over 25 countries and a growing annual revenue that now surpasses USD 1.2 billion, we work with organizations who design, develop or deliver products and services. We help the world’s biggest and brightest brands across practically every industry. So, how did we get here? Imagine working within a division of Larsen & Toubro (L&T) – the engineering giant with revenue in excess of USD 27 billion. Once our success became too big to contain, we were spun off into our own business, converging our engineering heritage with unmatched technology prowess, and bringing our unique brand of engineering to clients worldwide. We define it as Purposeful. Agile. Innovation. Fast-forward to today, and we’re leading the charge in industries that are shaping the future. The secret to our success is that every one of us is an Engineer at Heart💙 It’s our 23,700 (and counting) experts who constantly redefine excellence through a commitment to innovation, agility, and sustainable engineering solutions. Our engineers aren’t just experts – they’re passionate problem solvers with a relentless drive to innovate. At LTTS, being an Engineer at Heart is more than a tag line; it’s a shared mindset that powers everything we do. And it helps us focus on our shared mission: Engineering the Change the world needs to see.

NAICS: 54139
NAICS Definition: Engineering Services
Employees: 39,594
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saipem.jpeg
Saipem
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l&t-technology-services-limited.jpeg
L&T Technology Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Saipem
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
L&T Technology Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saipem in 2025.

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L&T Technology Services in 2025.

Incident History — Saipem (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saipem cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — L&T Technology Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L&T Technology Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saipem.jpeg
Saipem
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l&t-technology-services-limited.jpeg
L&T Technology Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Saipem company and L&T Technology Services company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, L&T Technology Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Saipem company.

In the current year, L&T Technology Services company and Saipem company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither L&T Technology Services company nor Saipem company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither L&T Technology Services company nor Saipem company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither L&T Technology Services company nor Saipem company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Saipem company nor L&T Technology Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Saipem nor L&T Technology Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

L&T Technology Services company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Saipem company.

L&T Technology Services company employs more people globally than Saipem company, reflecting its scale as a Engineering Services.

Neither Saipem nor L&T Technology Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Saipem nor L&T Technology Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Saipem nor L&T Technology Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Saipem nor L&T Technology Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Saipem nor L&T Technology Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Saipem nor L&T Technology Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N