Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Saint-Gobain Football CupSaint-Gobain Football Cup
VS
Builders FirstSourceBuilders FirstSource
Saint-Gobain Football Cup

Saint-Gobain Football Cup

12 place de l'iris, Courbevoie, Île-de-France, FR, 92096

Last Update: 06/12/2025

View Profile
748/1000Moderate

La Saint-Gobain Football Cup est LA compétition de football des Business School et des Ecoles d’Ingénieurs. Cet évènement réunit chaque année plus de 3.000 étudiant.es et se positionne comme le troisième évènement étudiant en France. Cette compétition incarne des val...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:103
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Builders FirstSource

Builders FirstSource

6031 Connection Dr, Suite 400, Irving, TX, US, 75039

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.bldr.com
728/1000Moderate

Builders FirstSource is the nation’s largest supplier of structural building products, value-added components and services to the professional market for new residential construction and repair and remodeling. Our focus is on providing unparalleled service to both large...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:11,723
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Saint-Gobain Football Cup

Saint-Gobain Football Cup

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Builders FirstSource

Builders FirstSource

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saint-Gobain Football Cup in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Builders FirstSource in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Saint-Gobain Football Cup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saint-Gobain Football Cup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Builders FirstSource (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Builders FirstSource cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Saint-Gobain Football Cup

Saint-Gobain Football Cup

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Builders FirstSource

Builders FirstSource

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BUI1774909946

FAQ

Between Saint-Gobain Football Cup company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Saint-Gobain Football Cup company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Saint-Gobain Football Cup company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Saint-Gobain Football Cup company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Saint-Gobain Football Cup company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Saint-Gobain Football Cup company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Saint-Gobain Football Cup company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Saint-Gobain Football Cup company and Builders FirstSource company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain Football Cup company and Builders FirstSource company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain Football Cup company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Saint-Gobain Football Cup company and Builders FirstSource company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Saint-Gobain Football Cup and Builders FirstSource, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain Football Cup and Builders FirstSource, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Saint-Gobain Football Cup or Builders FirstSource ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Saint-Gobain Football Cup or Builders FirstSource ?
Between Saint-Gobain Football Cup and Builders FirstSource, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Saint-Gobain Football Cup and Builders FirstSource, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2