Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Saint-Gobain Weber UK & IrelandSaint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland
VS
Ambuja Cements LimitedAmbuja Cements Limited
Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland

Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland

Dickens House, Enterprise Way, Flitwick, Bedfordshire, MK45 5BY, GB

Last Update: 31/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.uk.weber
747/1000Moderate

As a recognised manufacturer and innovator of easy-to-apply products in the construction mortars, façades, flooring systems and tile-fixing markets, Weber is a leading player in the construction products industry. The natural synergy between these specialist activities ...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:106
Subsidiaries:87
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ambuja Cements Limited

Ambuja Cements Limited

Elegant Business Park, Off Andheri Kurla Road,, Mumbai, 400059, IN

Last Update: 19/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ambujacement.com
776/1000Fair

Ambuja Cements Ltd. is among the leading cement companies in India. It is a member of the Adani Group - the largest and fastest-growing portfolio of diversified sustainable businesses. Ambuja Cement is known for its hassle-free, home-building solutions. Its unique produ...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:12,091
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland

Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ambuja Cements Limited

Ambuja Cements Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ambuja Cements Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ambuja Cements Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ambuja Cements Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland

Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ambuja Cements Limited

Ambuja Cements Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland company and Ambuja Cements Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland company and Ambuja Cements Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland company and Ambuja Cements Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland company and Ambuja Cements Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland company and Ambuja Cements Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland company and Ambuja Cements Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland company and Ambuja Cements Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland company and Ambuja Cements Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland company and Ambuja Cements Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland company and Ambuja Cements Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland company and Ambuja Cements Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland and Ambuja Cements Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland and Ambuja Cements Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland or Ambuja Cements Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland or Ambuja Cements Limited ?
Between Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland and Ambuja Cements Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Saint-Gobain Weber UK & Ireland and Ambuja Cements Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA