Comparison Overview
Saint-Gobain Sekurit

Saint-Gobain Sekurit
18 Avenue d'Alsace, Paris, La Défense, 92400, FR
Last Update: 04/12/2025
Saint-Gobain Sekurit employs 13,000 people in 19 countries, has 33 plants and 4 main Research and Development centers. Saint-Gobain Sekurit supplies innovative integrated glazing systems. • For automotive industry: Saint-Gobain Sekurit is a reference supplier of inno...

Corning Incorporated
One Riverfront Plaza, Corning, 14831, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Corning is one of the world's leading innovators in materials science, with a 170+ year track record of life-changing inventions. Corning applies its unparalleled expertise in glass science, ceramics science, and optical physics along with its deep manufacturing and eng...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Saint-Gobain Sekurit







Corning Incorporated






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Glass, Ceramics and Concrete Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Saint-Gobain Sekurit in 2026.
Incidents vs Glass, Ceramics and Concrete Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Corning Incorporated in 2026.
Incident History - Saint-Gobain Sekurit (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Saint-Gobain Sekurit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Corning Incorporated (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Corning Incorporated cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Saint-Gobain Sekurit

Corning Incorporated
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.