Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Saint-Gobain Performance PlasticsSaint-Gobain Performance Plastics
VS
Berry Global, Inc.Berry Global, Inc.
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics

Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics

31500 Solon Rd, Solon, OH, 44139, US

Last Update: 03/01/2026

View Profile
750/1000Fair

Saint-Gobain is the world’s leading producer of engineered high performance polymer products for virtually every industry around the globe, including automotive, medical, pharmaceutical, chemical, food, beverage, airline, truck manufacturing, appliances, construction, ...

NAICS:3261
NAICS Definition:Plastics Product Manufacturing
Employees:2,068
Subsidiaries:100
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Berry Global, Inc.

Berry Global, Inc.

101 Oakley Street, Evansville, IN, US, 47710

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.berryglobal.com
767/1000Fair

Berry Global, Inc. has merged with Amcor as of April 30, 2025. As a global leader in packaging solutions for consumer and healthcare products, our industry-leading innovation capabilities, global scale and technical expertise help our customers grow and meet the needs...

NAICS:3261
NAICS Definition:Plastics Product Manufacturing
Employees:11,135
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics

Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Berry Global, Inc.

Berry Global, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Plastics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Plastics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Berry Global, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Berry Global, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Berry Global, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics

Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Berry Global, Inc.

Berry Global, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics and Berry Global, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics and Berry Global, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics or Berry Global, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics or Berry Global, Inc. ?
Between Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics and Berry Global, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics and Berry Global, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA