Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Saint-Gobain AbrasivesSaint-Gobain Abrasives
VS
Liebherr GroupLiebherr Group
Saint-Gobain Abrasives

Saint-Gobain Abrasives

1 New Bond Street, Worcester, 01615, US

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

We offer powerful, precise and user-friendly solutions for every market and for every step of the abrasives process, enabling our customers to cut, shape and finish all materials in the most complex and challenging applications. By working closely with end-users and g...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:3,825
Subsidiaries:98
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Liebherr Group

Liebherr Group

Liebherr-International Deutschland GmbH, Biberach, 88400, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.liebherr.com
776/1000Fair

Established in 1949, the Liebherr Group today is not only one of the biggest construction equipment manufacturers in the world, but also offers high-quality, user-oriented products and services in many other areas. The family-run technology company employs nearly 50,000...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:10,864
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Saint-Gobain Abrasives

Saint-Gobain Abrasives

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Liebherr Group

Liebherr Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saint-Gobain Abrasives in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Liebherr Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Saint-Gobain Abrasives (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saint-Gobain Abrasives cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Liebherr Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Liebherr Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Saint-Gobain Abrasives

Saint-Gobain Abrasives

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Liebherr Group

Liebherr Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Saint-Gobain Abrasives company and Liebherr Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Saint-Gobain Abrasives company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Saint-Gobain Abrasives company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Saint-Gobain Abrasives company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Saint-Gobain Abrasives company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Saint-Gobain Abrasives company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Saint-Gobain Abrasives company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Saint-Gobain Abrasives company and Liebherr Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain Abrasives company and Liebherr Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain Abrasives company and Liebherr Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Saint-Gobain Abrasives company and Liebherr Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Saint-Gobain Abrasives and Liebherr Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain Abrasives and Liebherr Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Saint-Gobain Abrasives or Liebherr Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Saint-Gobain Abrasives or Liebherr Group ?
Between Saint-Gobain Abrasives and Liebherr Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Saint-Gobain Abrasives and Liebherr Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9