Comparison Overview
Sainsbury's Digital, Tech and Data

Sainsbury's Digital, Tech and Data
33 Holborn, London, EC1N 2HT, GB
Last Update: 25/03/2026
Our tech team plays a vital role in supporting Sainsbury’s mission and strategy for the future. We power the UK’s third-busiest retail site, and our innovations allow our customers to shop and connect with us whenever they want to, reliably and safely, and help our coll...

Nike
One Bowerman Drive, Beaverton, OR, US, 97005
Last Update: 13/06/2026
NIKE, Inc. is a purpose-driven organization energized by a shared commitment to move the world forward through the power of sport. We champion diversity and amplify individual passions to bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete* in the world. Here, every te...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sainsbury's Digital, Tech and Data







Nike






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sainsbury's Digital, Tech and Data in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
Nike has 183.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Sainsbury's Digital, Tech and Data (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sainsbury's Digital, Tech and Data cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Nike (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Nike cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sainsbury's Digital, Tech and Data

Nike
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.