Comparison Overview
Sainsbury's Digital, Tech and Data

Sainsbury's Digital, Tech and Data
33 Holborn, London, EC1N 2HT, GB
Last Update: 25/03/2026
Our tech team plays a vital role in supporting Sainsbury’s mission and strategy for the future. We power the UK’s third-busiest retail site, and our innovations allow our customers to shop and connect with us whenever they want to, reliably and safely, and help our coll...

JYSK
Sødalsparken 18, Brabrand, 8220, DK
Last Update: 05/04/2026
JYSK is an international home furnishing retailer with Scandinavian roots that makes it easy to furnish every room in any home and garden. JYSK delivers a great Scandinavian offer for everyone within sleeping and living. We are a global retail chain of stores and web ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Sainsbury's Digital, Tech and Data







JYSK






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sainsbury's Digital, Tech and Data in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for JYSK in 2026.
Incident History - Sainsbury's Digital, Tech and Data (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sainsbury's Digital, Tech and Data cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - JYSK (X = Date, Y = Severity)
JYSK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Sainsbury's Digital, Tech and Data

JYSK
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.